Rating Methodology

Overview

Every platform on this site is scored using a transparent 100-point system. Scores reflect published features, official pricing data and documented platform capabilities. We do not fabricate hands-on testing claims or adjust scores based on affiliate relationships.

Base Scoring Criteria

Each platform is evaluated across nine weighted criteria:

Criterion Weight What we evaluate
Execution and order tools 20% Order types, hotkeys, DOM, bracket orders, speed of entry tools
Total trading cost 20% Commissions, contract fees, data fees, platform fees, margin rates
Platform and charting 15% Chart quality, indicators, layout customization, replay tools
Market access 10% Number of asset classes, exchanges, and global markets available
Margin and capital efficiency 10% Intraday margin, portfolio margin, capital requirements
Reliability and usability 10% Uptime, interface clarity, mobile experience, customer support
API and automation 5% REST/WebSocket API, strategy automation, third-party integrations
Short-selling access 5% Locate availability, borrow costs, short-selling tools
Education and paper trading 5% Simulation quality, educational resources, onboarding

Trader-Type Adjustments

In addition to the overall score, we calculate suitability scores for different trader profiles. These adjust the base weights to reflect what matters most for each type:

Data Sources

What We Do NOT Do

Verification Status

Each data point carries one of four statuses:

Updates

We review data quarterly and update immediately when material changes are identified. Each platform record includes a lastVerified date. See our homepage update log for recent changes.